Peter, "It can, the driver has been in there for years, but no-one does it, considering you have already paid for an SQLBase license and that's a far better platform."
That is certainly a debatable point about a "Far better Platform", mate. I know a lot of people have a grudge against Microsoft, but I would question the validity of that statement, or at least the criteria on which that statement is based.!! I know I've probably pushed some buttons I shouldn't have Pete, But...let's just agree to disagree on that topic.. Everyone knows I'm a Microsoft Boy...and proud of it !! So don't bother responding mate, we don't want to start World War III. Let's just have a little chuckle to ourselves, and leave it there !! Regards Barry Lollo Microsoft Rules !! -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Machell Sent: Thursday, 2 February 2006 10:00 PM To: General Practice Computing Group Talk Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] File repair utility in MD2 On 02/02/2006, at 5:28 PM, Barry Lollo wrote: > I personally don't like the need to do registry imports, every time I > add a new user, to set the preferences. Yes there are pros and cons with this but it does work rather well in a multi-site setup or with roaming profiles. > If it can run on MS SQL, then I might actually tackle Nat on that, > because that will solve another issue for me, and that is my preferred > DB. It can, the driver has been in there for years, but no-one does it, considering you have already paid for an SQLBase license and that's a far better platform. Some new hospital sites are keen to rollout on MSSQL and I'm doing my best to talk him (Nat) out of it. Peter. _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
