Andrew McIntyre wrote:

>The second goal is semantic interoperability where the
>meaning of what is transmitted is preserved. We need a common
>terminology and standards for this. The combination of HL7, Snomed-CT
>and probably archetypes can achieve this. There was a standards
>meeting on Friday, which I attended where we have pretty much nailed
>down transmitting complex structed data in HL7 - ie Archetyped data.
>  
>
Excellent.

Is there a human readable form of what was decided?

David


-- 
For secure communication with the GMC see http://gmc.net.au 
gpg key Secure Mail (Current 10 February 2005) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
0x9CAE0C53 at keyserver.medicine.net.au


_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to