David Guest wrote:
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
The second goal is semantic interoperability where the
meaning of what is transmitted is preserved. We need a common
terminology and standards for this. The combination of HL7, Snomed-CT
and probably archetypes can achieve this. There was a standards
meeting on Friday, which I attended where we have pretty much nailed
down transmitting complex structed data in HL7 - ie Archetyped data.
Excellent.
Is there a human readable form of what was decided?
David,
Apparently not, just a geek-readable version!
Hang on, I thought you were a geek! So who were you wanting to show it
to, your mother-in-law?
Greg
--
Greg Twyford
Information Management & Technology Program Officer
Canterbury Division of General Practice
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph.: 02 9787 9033
Fax: 02 9787 9200
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
***********************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail and their attached files,
including replies and forwarded copies, are confidential and intended
solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged or prohibited
from disclosure and unauthorised use. If you are not the intended
recipient, any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure,
modification, distribution and/or publication or any action taken or
omitted to be taken in reliance upon this message or its attachments is
prohibited.
All liability for viruses is excluded to the fullest extent permitted by
law.
***********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
