Richard Hosking wrote: > NEHTA docs seem to generally make sense to me. In particular some > comments about competing interests not being explicit or even > acknowledged. > There appear to be a bewildering array of acronyms - who are IT-014? > They have apparently been funded since 1999. > Would it be worth going to the standards forum or would it be another > talk fest? > (assuming one could go as an individual)
They're a bit like UB40. I have all their albums. https://committees.standards.org.au/COMMITTEES/IT-014/ David -- For secure communication with the GMC see http://gmc.net.au gpg key Secure Mail (Current 10 February 2005) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0x9CAE0C53 at keyserver.medicine.net.au _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
