Richard Hosking wrote: > NEHTA docs seem to generally make sense to me. In particular some > comments about competing interests not being explicit or even > acknowledged. > There appear to be a bewildering array of acronyms - who are IT-014? > They have apparently been funded since 1999. > Would it be worth going to the standards forum or would it be another > talk fest? > (assuming one could go as an individual)
https://committees.standards.org.au/COMMITTEES/IT-014/ > > R > > Peter MacIsaac wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of HL7 Australia >> Sent: Thursday, 16 March 2006 8:26 PM >> To: HL7 Australia >> Subject: [HL7Info] FW: NEHTA >> Dear HL7ers, >> >> NEHTA have just released 'National E-Health Standards Development - A >> Management >> Framework' at >> >> http://www.nehta.gov.au/component/option,com_docman/task,doc_download/gid,70 >> >> /Itemid,139/ >> >> >> >> HL7 Australia >> _________________________________________ >> >> PO Box 3289, WESTON CREEK 2611, Australia >> Phone: (0413) 138 024 Fax: (02) 9475 0685 >> E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.HL7.org.au >> _________________________________________ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gpcg_talk mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Gpcg_talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk -- For secure communication with the GMC see http://gmc.net.au gpg key Secure Mail (Current 10 February 2005) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0x9CAE0C53 at keyserver.medicine.net.au _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
