As far as I know this is not on NeHTA's radar.

Michael

David More wrote:
> Hi David,
>  
> So the argument for serious functional certification and accreditation
> of GP (and specialist and hospital) systems firms.
>  
> I wonder is NEHTA (or anyone else) getting its / their act together on this?
>  
> Cheers
>  
> David
> 
> ----
> Dr David G More MB, PhD, FACHI
> Phone +61-2-9438-2851 Fax +61-2-9906-7038
> Skype Username : davidgmore
> E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> HealthIT Blog - www.aushealthit.blogspot.com
> 
> 
> On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 16:42:47 +1000, David Guest wrote:
>> Horst Herb wrote:
>>> So is mine.
>>> Would be most happy for national benchmarking parameters - as long as
> we can ensure a non-punitive system, else we will see doctors forging
> parameters just
>>> to appear "good"
>>>
>> I have no experience of it (yet) but I understand the National
> Collaboratives Program is a worthwhile undertaking.
>>
>> I had a validation today. No, that's not it. Maybe it was intervention.
> No, that's not it either. Ah yes, it was an accreditation. We passed
> with drooping
>> colours. We would have failed under the Third Edition Standards. That's
> the one where you have to make sure your patients attend for pathology,
> radiology,
>> specialist appointments and general recalls. It seems to me that this
> makes a computerised medical record compulsory. Apparently, MD3 would
> fail as well.
>> Their recall function moves patients from the "Recall" list to the
> "Action" list when the function is activated. If the patient fails to
> present for the
>> requested activity, the "Recall" drops out of the system exposing the
> practice to potential litigation.
>>
>> My colleagues think this is bunkum but the lawyers like it a lot.
>>
>> David
>>
>> P.S. Job wanted for computer literate GP. Level of responsibility
> limited to his own actions.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gpcg_talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to