Greg Markey wrote:
Dear Oliver, My practice is, say, 90km from yours, but we may as well be 900 or 9,000kms away when we talk about things like this. I've spoken about Argus to my IT adviser and to others who could be involved (our path choice is limited to IMVS, for a start)
That's why I said "For those of us who have a choice in pathology and medical imaging providers". I realise that in rural areas there may not be much of a choice.
> but their eyes mist
over and they change the subject every time. I admire your achievement, but it means very little down here in the back-blocks.
There is nothing to stop you telling whatever specialists are treating your patients that you really want them to send their reports to you via Argus, and there is nothing to stop you telling IMVS that you want it also to use Argus. They can add your name to the list of troublemakers, if you're not on it already. When that list gets long enough, and it won't need to get very long at all, the specialists and IMVS will start thinking "maybe we'd better look at this weird Argus thing - there might be something in it".
-- Oliver Frank, general practitioner 255 North East Road, Hampstead Gardens, South Australia 5086 Phone 08 8261 1355 Fax 08 8266 5149 Mobile 0407 181 683 _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
