Well said Mario.  I was going to add to your list, but decided not to.

Cedric

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Mario Ruiz
Sent: Sunday, 17 September 2006 1:23 PM
To: General Practice Computing Group Talk
Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] YADL


That's right Andrew, never let science get in the way of a good story.

- JFK's assasination
- the moon landing was a fake
- the holocaust never existed
- no jews died in the WTC 911 job
- the Illuminati
- KAL-007
- Elders of Zion
- the AIDS conspiracy

All known to have no scientific basis.

Mario




Andrew Patterson wrote:
> Hey, I'm as big a lefty as the next person and am perfectly willing to 
> believe that US politicians are a level more corrupt than anything we 
> can produce but you can't be serious about believing theories like 
> this? You are all scientists aren't you - that require evidence,
> sources, believe in occams razor etc. Rather than believe
> one Mormon nuclear physicist,
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_E._Jones
> perhaps we should trust in the general consensus of
> the hundreds of structural engineers who have analysed
> the collapse of the towers. Certainly, when I next
> build a skyscraper, I'd be consulting with actual structural
> engineers and not random physicists.
> 
> For a step by step debunk 
> http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html
> 
> Of course, the kicker for me is the premise that this
> was all orchestrated by the genius' in the whitehouse
> to get us into a war.. but they then needed
> a reason like WMD's to convice us to go to war in Iraq,
> and then of course couldn't find any when they got there..
> 
> So they are smart and callous enough to stage
> the destruction of 4 buildings in the US, the murder of
> 3000 people just to get us into a war, but then can't
> manage to 'find' some WMD's once they get there
> that would justify the whole thing..  right...
> 
> Andrew
> 
> btw I've been having some doubts about the moon
> landings so if anyone has some material on that
> it would be much appreciated 
> _______________________________________________
> Gpcg_talk mailing list
> [email protected] 
> http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
> 
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk


_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to