Thanks Jon
I am just musing that we might not be able to use the UNSW work in any
open system without some sort of licensing arrangement. The universities
(rightly so) are generally seeking to commercialize their work if possible.
R
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Richard, if you are addressing that to me, then i can't say as I work at
USydney. here my IP is theoretically owned by the university, but that
doesn't stop us releasing content under GPLs.
jon patrick
Quoting Richard Hosking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
What the IP issues for the UNSW work? (Who owns it - is it open source?)
I asked this question before and I dont recall getting a reply. (forgive
me if there was a response)
R
Horst Herb wrote:
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 19:26, Tony Eviston wrote:
How can we resolve the potential conflict between the donors need for
efficiency and deliverable product and what might be perceived as the
academic need to extend the boundaries into research areas (a
perception
of Ivory tower syndrome)?
fine grained modularity
actually, a document store backend (as opposed to a relational one)
makes this
a lot more difficult
Horst
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
