On Tuesday 19 September 2006 22:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If we hit the spot we will have something that at least
> performs up to the current EDIS but can do better with functionality for
> clinicians,
that wouldn't take much.
the user interface is dreadful.
and the automated letters it produces - their only selling point is
legibility.
--
You can tune a piano, but you can't tuna fish.
You can tune a filesystem, but you can't tuna fish.
-- from the tunefs(8) man page
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
