Tony Lembke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Interestingly, this is where GnuMED 'Librarian' version (v0.2) is up > to, with a simple Windows and Debian installer available. > Ian would be more up to date than I. > It would be a pity to overlook the excellent work already done.
Absolutely agree with Tony and Syan that the GNUmed baby should not be thrown out with the bathwater. At teh very least, there are huge lessons to be learnt about what to do and what not to do. It also may be (and almost is) a useful platform to act as part of the "plausible promise" when talking to would-be funders, and as a platform for exploring new ideas regarding interfaces, data capture and analysis and so on. But it is also, after 5 or 6 years of many different peopoe working on it in teh absence of strong leadership or a clear vision, somewhat of a sprawling mess, and parts of it I find positively baroque. Tim C _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
