On Wednesday 06 December 2006 15:09, Chris Scott wrote: > Additionally in order for the HUDGP to evaluate > systems, clinical messaging vendors have provided confidential > information and intellectual property (IP) to the Division. Some vendors > have specifically prohibited the HUDGP from passing on confidential > information and IP to any other party, thus we cannot provide details of > our findings as some have requested.
I think any vendor who witholds information about *security* related systems should be implicitly excluded as an option. Security system vendors who have a clean act and a good trustworthy product will always fully disclose the details about their product Those who rely on security by obscurity are nothing but snake oil peddlers by definition No need to name any particular vendor, but the HUDGP would be well advised to take such thoughts into consideration when choosing Horst _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
