> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scott > Sent: Wednesday, 6 December 2006 2:40 PM
> Dear All, > The HUDGP is currently finalising a review of the functionality of clinical messaging applications and how these systems might serve > our community in the future. At this point the HUDGP is not in a position to make a statement. Additionally in order for the > HUDGP to evaluate systems, clinical messaging vendors have provided confidential information and intellectual property (IP) to > the Division. Some vendors have specifically prohibited the HUDGP from passing on confidential information and IP to any other > party, thus we cannot provide details of our findings as some have requested. Is HUDGP not able to provide details even to its own members? Felicity Goswell may ask "What's new?", since she reports never having even heard of the Division's deal of last year with HealthLink. Where is the transparency that your members presumably expect from HUDGP? Oliver Frank, general practitioner 255 North East Road, Hampstead Gardens South Australia 5086 Ph. 08 8261 1355 Fax 08 8266 5149 M 0407 181 683 _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
