On Wednesday 06 December 2006 15:09, Chris Scott wrote:
>  It is
> clear that the energy being directed by the vendors to clinical
> messaging in this country is a positive sign for the future.

No. It's a clear sign that some vendors hope for huge cash return by 
establishing either a (regional) monopoly or at least a high degree of 
customer lock-in.

It may have stiffer competition = better products as a side effect, but I 
wouldn't take that for granted.

If we would have a situation where vendors would be compelled to comply with 
interoperable standards and only differenciate themselves in customer 
support, ease of use of product, ease of installation and maintenance of 
product then such vendor enthusiasm would be excellent news indeed - alas, it 
is more the enthusiasm that comes with staking out an exlusive claim on a 
gold field.

Horst
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to