David More wrote: > By 2005 a review of Tim's bureaucrats determined this was not a good idea - > was complex, > would cost a bundle etc - so a change management strategy "replaced" > Healthconnect.
Hey, they're not my bureaucrats. Wrong level of government to start with, and besides, I am a public health bureaucrat (I'd prefer "technocrat"), not a senior health IT bureaucrat in charge of 7 and 8 figure budget health IT projects, like you were, David. For me, all this health IT stuff is just a means to an end - the improvement and/or protection of the health of the public. Although many of the technical aspects of the means to that end I find fascinating, the task of actual deployment of health IT in the real world is a deary, tedious and dispiriting business indeed. Tim C _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
