Greg Twyford wrote:
Horst Herb wrote:
On Monday 19 February 2007 11:15, Greg Twyford wrote:
This may have some applicability in practices. How much were the
devices, and what transfer speed are you getting?
It has very limited applicability for practices, because your data is
shared with anybody else hanging on the same power "subnet", and there
is not even a minimal standard for encryption equivalent at least to
WAP for ethernet over power line (which has nothing to do with the
power over ethernet topic the subject line suggests)
Horst,
Do you know how big that "subnet" is likely to be? NSW power-grid? Back
to the building's fusebox? Back to the local transformer?
Greg
Sorry, EOP, not POE. Bloody acronyms. I must RTFM.
Greg
--
Greg Twyford
Information Management & Technology Program Officer
Canterbury Division of General Practice
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph.: 02 9787 9033
Fax: 02 9787 9200
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
***********************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail and their attached files,
including replies and forwarded copies, are confidential and intended
solely for the addressee(s) and may be legally privileged or prohibited
from disclosure and unauthorised use. If you are not the intended
recipient, any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure,
modification, distribution and/or publication or any action taken or
omitted to be taken in reliance upon this message or its attachments is
prohibited.
All liability for viruses is excluded to the fullest extent permitted by
law.
***********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
