On Wednesday 21 February 2007 12:55, James wrote: > The federal government put in place legislation determining electronic > images of original documents are valid. > The high court has ruled- Scanned documents are acceptable for evidence > purposed. Unless there is a specific legislative override to scan documents > for medical specialist I am sure you would quickly over rule any nit wit > arguing you had to hold both the paper and scanned image. Object in writing > and demand the auditor proves the legislation supporting his rather stupid > argument. Do not accept guidelines. Demand the legislation. > > I wonder if you just had a ill-informed auditor with a paper fetish?
I always thought being diagnosed with having a paper fetish was a primary employment requirement at HIC - that plus demonstrating genuine unfaked ignorance in all things digital and medical. HIC gave me the shits today - for urgent family reasons I have to leave this Friday. Didn't want to leave the Dorrigo Plateau without any medical services on that day, so I organized a locum at ultra short notice at hideous costs (he gets 100% of all grossings day and night plus a minimum guarantee of $700 for per 6 hours sessional work) - only to be told by the HIC clowns it would take 5 working days for him to get a provider number for our place. We'll see - last thing I heard they "will see what they can do". Individuals often try to be helpful, but the system as such is an obscene monstrosity. I don't care any more. This is highly organized insanity beyond my control. Guess if somebody dies in my absence the only satisfaction we will get is being able to organize a lynch party feeding the responsible paper clowns to the media sharks. Horst _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
