Surely this is the essence of the matter - if the referring GP has
evidence of the referral (as he should) and is willing to certify that
he made it, all this fuss about what documentation is irrelevant.
R
Duncan Guy wrote:
The exerpt from the rules seem to create a number of roadblocks to
scanning including the sequential numbering and an independent person
signing off on the scan, all makes it v. difficult
A colleague had a referral questioned, he was able to provide a
scanned copy. The HIC snoops said that wasnt enough, he argued, it
went back and forth with no ruling. In the end he rang the GP
concerned and asked if a duplicate referral could be issued, this was
done and HIC was happy
So no resolution to the issue of scanning,
Duncan
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
