> Best Practice currently produces and imports REF messages, but I am > reluctant to pay for AHML compliance until I have some formal documentation > that outlines the message structure. Without this, it is trial and error - > I build a message and see if passes the test. If it doesn't, I change it > and hope that it will pass next time. This is a waste of my time. > > I don't think that this is good enough for a proposed national accreditation > mechanism for clinical messaging and believe that if AHML are serious, they > should publish a formal specification for a REF message that vendors can > refer to when developing messaging components. > > Frank >
Hi Frank, AS4700.6 is what you need to look at. Thats what the AHML certification is based on. Its free from the Standards Australia Website Andrew McIntyre _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
