Geoff, Do AHML have any published documentation that software vendors can work to prior to seeking accreditation? If so, where can we access it?
Frank Frank Pyefinch [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geoff Sayer Sent: Wednesday, 2 May 2007 10:11 PM To: 'General Practice Computing Group Talk' Subject: RE: [GPCG_TALK] If it sounds too good to be true it probablyis -REFvs ORU Hi Andrew; Andrew wrote: Geoff we are following documentation produced by HCN here so calling it "jury rigged" is a bit harsh on your previous employer. Geoff wrote: I wasn't suggesting HCN was "jury rigging" anything - that was being pointed elsewhere based on your earlier descriptions of the use of "undocumented mechanisms". Given my experience I would advise against the use of "undocumented mechanisms". Rather I would support and encourage working with different parties to implement sustainable and viable standards. Furthermore I am encouraging that there is wider acceptance/support by message providers and Clinical Systems of AHML's role in these endeavours as well as a Code of Practice that a wide diverse range of parties can be signatories to. Given an acceptable Code of Practice we would hope that enduser's can then use it as a way of benchmarking any application with a trusted level of expectation in the way an application is supposed to work and is supported over time. Geoff Geoff Sayer HealthLink _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
