Tim Churches wrote:
So yes, nice that AHML exists, and they should continue their work and
continue to be funded (by whom?), but don't treat their assessment of
your messages as the Word of Deity-of-your-choice. Instead use it as a
filter to target careful re-examination of the messages or aspects they
flag as errors, but do use your critical faculties in doing so.
Tim C
We at Argus have done just that. We pass our messages thru the AHML
free test facility and this is a guide to us to locate obvious errors
whilst development is taking place. A 'certification' at this stage
could not be justified on cost/benefit basis.
Ross Davey
ArgusConnect
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
