At 7:34 pm +1000 24/5/07, Peter Machell wrote:
On 24/05/2007, at 7:03 PM, Andrew wrote:
I seem to remember that the old Kyocera's would print fine if you use the
old old HP 4 or HP 4P driver.
That might get around the medtech32 issues ?
We set almost all laser printers to use the HP Laserjet 4 driver
unless they require A5, for which we use the HP Laserjet 5 driver.
These drivers are small and refined and print considerably faster
than the native drivers, especially when using terminal services.
My current favourite lasers are Lexmark, because except for the very
smallest they all come with Network and Parallel ports as well as
USB, and can do real LPR printing, the best way to print with thin
clients. Kyocera do this too but we've had a few too many returns
since the merge with Mita. They just don't make 'em like they used
too.
Having said that, all laser printers suck. They are old mechanical
technology and it's long past time we moved on from paper.
cheers,
Peter.
Interestingly, Lexmark is consistently at the bottom of the pile in
this printer satisfaction survey...
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,2006498,00.asp
--
Dr Ian R Cheong, BMedSc, FRACGP, GradDipCompSc, MBA(Exec)
Health Informatics Consultant, Brisbane, Australia
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(for urgent matters, please send a copy to my practice email as well:
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
PRIVACY NOTE
I am happy for others to forward on email sent by me to public email lists.
Please ask my permission first if you wish to forward private email
to other parties.
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
