I think it is geek speak for something that actually works.
What gets me about all these so called 'people who know' sprouting
forth 'I recommend xyz program because it is the best' is that they
obviously have no idea of how a GP works. If they did they would adv
them to try several different software packages. I can work quite
happily with MD and did for years and now work even happier with BP. I
tried Genie - good program but did not suit me, tried Medtech and could
not get along with it etc.
Someone once said 'When you have seen one GP surgery, you have seen one
GP surgery'. We are all different and do things differently so
different programs for different people.
N
Jim Glaspole wrote:
Richard Terry wrote:
On Thursday 28 June 2007 23:56, James wrote:
wish list items you might like to recommend for medical software?
There is only one program on the market with any intelligence and a
good functional paradigm and that's Profile.
Medtech is functionally hopeless and to think you can improve it by a
wish
The fellow is a software development consultant from India. He is
visiting
me next week. When we spoke to day he said he is interested in
discussing
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
Richard
I feel a complete ignoramus but what is a functional paradigm? How is
this manifested in Profile's design?
Regards
Jim
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
