On Monday 16 July 2007 11:22, David Guest wrote:
> Having seen the upgrade process in detail, however, I have a great deal
> of sympathy for HCN in trying to support this upgrade across a range of
> Microsoft servers and operating systems. There are just too many
> variables to make it seamless for everyone (sor perhaps even anyone).
itis called PBD ("problem by design")
If they would opt to store all information on a single *maintainable* server
backend like PostgreSQL, updates , backups and restores would be a breeze,
not interrupt workflow, and no support issues either once a system has been
set up and running
This silly idea of multiple data repositories plus the licenseing issues
encumbered, artificially crippled and hidesouly unmaintainable MSSQL server
is just the recipe for support disasters - they have been asking for it, now
they get it.
Horst
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
