Hi, I opened a thread for discussion about labels and priorities for issues in the RFC, but there was not so much interest apparently [1]. I still believe that we should keep raster(3d), vector, temporal and so on as components. I think those are useful and make search easier. Modules is maybe too general, IMO.
my 0.2 cents Vero [1] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2019-March/091584.html El mar., 26 mar. 2019 a las 21:06, Martin Landa (<[email protected]>) escribió: > Hi, > > út 26. 3. 2019 v 11:28 odesílatel Markus Neteler <[email protected]> > napsal: > > where do we stand here at time? > > RFC document is OK for me. I am ready to vote about that. Ma > > -- > Martin Landa > http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa > http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa > _______________________________________________ > grass-psc mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
_______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
