Hi, st 27. 3. 2019 v 14:30 odesílatel Anna Petrášová <[email protected]> napsal: >>> I opened a thread for discussion about labels and priorities for issues in >>> the RFC, but there was not so much interest apparently [1]. I still believe >>> that we should keep >>> raster(3d), vector, temporal and so on as components. I think those are >>> useful and make search easier. Modules is maybe too general, IMO.
right, modules are too generic. * raster (everything raster related -> 2d, 3d, imagery) * vector (everything vector related -> 2d, 3d) * temporal would be enough? > I agree, although with raster, vector etc it's not quite clear if it should > refer to modules or libraries or both. Also don't forget labels work > differently than trac categories. > > I would also add 'Mac specific', (I don't think we need also Linux specific) > and maybe just shorten it to 'MacOS' and 'Windows'. Sound reasonable. > Also I would add a label 'beginner'. Why not :-) Ma -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa _______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
