On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 4:48 AM Margherita Di Leo <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 10:59 PM Veronica Andreo <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I opened a thread for discussion about labels and priorities for issues >> in the RFC, but there was not so much interest apparently [1]. I still >> believe that we should keep >> raster(3d), vector, temporal and so on as components. I think those are >> useful and make search easier. Modules is maybe too general, IMO. >> > I agree, although with raster, vector etc it's not quite clear if it should refer to modules or libraries or both. Also don't forget labels work differently than trac categories. I would also add 'Mac specific', (I don't think we need also Linux specific) and maybe just shorten it to 'MacOS' and 'Windows'. Also I would add a label 'beginner'. Anna > I tend to agree with Vero. > Cheers, > >> >> my 0.2 cents >> Vero >> >> [1] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2019-March/091584.html >> >> >> > -- > Margherita Di Leo > _______________________________________________ > grass-psc mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
_______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
