I'm with Vero and agree with Moritz on the definition-of-the-community being the big question.
My two cents, Anna > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 10:40:07 +0200 > From: Moritz Lennert <[email protected]> > To: Veronica Andreo <[email protected]>, luca delucchi > <[email protected]>, Nikos Alexandris <[email protected]> > Cc: grass-user <[email protected]>, grass-dev > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [GRASS-user] [GRASS-dev] Comment regarding PSC election > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > > > >... >The big question is obviously the definition of the community, and of > >its members. We don't have such a definition for GRASS at this stage > >(e.g. equivalent to the charter membership in OSGeo), and so the easiest > >(but as you highlight probably not the best) was to use svn-access as a > >proxy. > > >Thanks for being "bothersome" ! ;-) > > >Moritz > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > grass-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user > > ------------------------------ > > End of grass-user Digest, Vol 123, Issue 27 > ******************************************* >
_______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
