Markus Neteler wrote > (sorry for cross-posting) > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Markus Neteler <
> neteler@ > > wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Michael Barton < > Michael.Barton@ > > wrote: >>> My perspective is that active contributors to the project should vote. >>> How to define them is a >>> more complicated issue and one of the things that prompted the long >>> email chain in the PCS IIRC. >> >> Indeed.... >> Additionally, it is *very* complicated to define who is a community >> member. >> >> Two options yet to consider: >> >> - the ChangeLog contains some references to code contributors without >> SVN core access, e.g. > ... >> In fact, all should have been added here: >> https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/contributors.csv >> but that file didn't get updated lately. > > I have spent 1-2 hours on this now and updated the right file: > https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/contributors_extra.csv > > to also reflect the last 5 years of contributions from people without > SVN write access. > This list of contributors should be considered by the CRO as part of > the voting group. > > Please let us know if a name is still missing there. Adam Laza? for reference see e.g. https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-commit/2016-August/039939.html Log: d.barscale: various GSoC improvments, author Adam Laza, merge from trunk r68529, r68570, r68947, r69005, r69006 ----- best regards Helmut -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Comment-regarding-PSC-election-tp5278038p5278874.html Sent from the Grass - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
