(sorry for cross-posting) On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Markus Neteler <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Michael Barton <[email protected]> > wrote: >> My perspective is that active contributors to the project should vote. How >> to define them is a >> more complicated issue and one of the things that prompted the long email >> chain in the PCS IIRC. > > Indeed.... > Additionally, it is *very* complicated to define who is a community member. > > Two options yet to consider: > > - the ChangeLog contains some references to code contributors without > SVN core access, e.g. ... > In fact, all should have been added here: > https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/contributors.csv > but that file didn't get updated lately.
I have spent 1-2 hours on this now and updated the right file: https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/contributors_extra.csv to also reflect the last 5 years of contributions from people without SVN write access. This list of contributors should be considered by the CRO as part of the voting group. Please let us know if a name is still missing there. Best, Markus _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
