2016-07-31 17:06 GMT-03:00 Markus Neteler <[email protected]>: > (sorry for cross-posting) > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Markus Neteler <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Michael Barton <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> My perspective is that active contributors to the project should vote. > How to define them is a > >> more complicated issue and one of the things that prompted the long > email chain in the PCS IIRC. > > > > Indeed.... > > Additionally, it is *very* complicated to define who is a community > member. > > > > Two options yet to consider: > > > > - the ChangeLog contains some references to code contributors without > > SVN core access, e.g. > ... > > In fact, all should have been added here: > > https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/contributors.csv > > but that file didn't get updated lately. > > I have spent 1-2 hours on this now and updated the right file: > https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/contributors_extra.csv > > to also reflect the last 5 years of contributions from people without > SVN write access. > This list of contributors should be considered by the CRO as part of > the voting group. >
This is great! Thank you so much, Markus! Best, Vero
_______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
