please unsubscrib us from this mailing list
sakhi 

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Dileep Raj 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 7:28 PM
  Subject: {greenyouth} Re: Caste and Gender In The Urban Space of Kerala



  A correction first.
  "though i asked wher r they? that provoked dilip"

  It's incorrect reporting. I asked couple of critical questionsin response to 
Ranjith's 
  arguments. That provoked him. He attacked me [ not my arguments] . This, only 
by way of reminding what happened.  

  On the problematization of metaphors like ' healthy', ' ulparty 
janadhipathyam' I agree with Ranjith's points.We couldn't be univocal in using 
words in best of times.  So,
  that could be more difficult in polemical situations.  My dream is that we 
could 
  articulate our concerns without being excessively bothered about political 
correctness. 
  When I am making myself available for criticism with all contradictions, I am 
also 
   expressing my willingness to withdraw my statements if somebody show that to 
be 
  problrmatic. While entering into a discussion, it is very difficult to 
proceed if this readyness is onesided. Once somebody claim that s/he is 
participating in a debate for polemical 
  purposes, it is very difficult to proceed. But in the process, I found that 
practice and standpoints are two different things. Ranjith is equally reflexive 
and democratic in the course of the debate. Thus my remark ' it is healthy' , 
like 'ulparty janadhipathyam.' etc. 
  No. I didn't imply that the dsicussion should be stopped. I meant the exact 
opposite. 
  But I have a request. If possible do allow some margin for conscious use of 
problematic 
  usages/ metaphors/ idioms. 

  Why I referred to Ranjith's certain critiques as ' displaced discourse'  
earlier have connection with this.  Ours is a new, pertinenet dialogue. It try 
to capture, theorise and enrich our political present/ practical experiences. 
In that way we are not repeating / quoting / settling any earlier debate .Nor 
do we expect that we could settle all our debates here. It is a bit mechanical  
 to bring in the ' correct arguments' wherever you find a word/ expression/ 
sentenece, disregarding the immediate context of the discussion.   Is it an 
effective way to brand whoever disagree with Ranjith or Venugopal as 
brahmanical and rehearse arguments against brahmanism?  Is it that simple? Thus 
my request not to simplify but complicate always!! 

  I think there is a deeper problem with the political framework in which 
Ranjith and I 
  view Chithralekha issue.  I place it in the frame of   single issue 
movements. There may be 
  people/ organisations involved in it who do have strong political positions 
which go well beyong the issue based solidarity. So, questioning the nature of 
civil society/ public sphere based on this resistence and resistence itself are 
two different affairs altogether. We could agree to disagree on the former, but 
do whatever is possible from within the platform which bring all concerned 
together. Thus if concrete steps arrived at, we could be part of it. This not 
in the least imply that this issue based alliance is apolitical or 'there is 
nothing to be discussed'. 
  What for me is important in all issue based solidarities is the rules by 
which we negotiate differences among ourselves. Whether in virtual or real 
world it is of great importance because none of us are machines/ cadres. even 
if we are coming together with cadre organisations, the principles by which we 
come together is important. 

  I know that this is not the only way to resist. A section can raise the issue 
with more political unity. That is one reason why we find several groups acting 
on same issues. But the question, whaether I am part of such a network , for 
me, could be decided if and only if my 
  equal rights are assured. Not that I won't support the issue but won't be 
part of that specific group.   


  I hope we could continue our debate without forcing others to one's position.















   
  On 7/26/07, Ranjit Ranjit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
    good that u read Ambedkar

    my point is simple-- Chitralekha issue is not just a HR case, it needs 
addressing Caste Question... if she's not a dalit, perhaps this atrocity may 
not have even occured... 

    and pure/impure debate is not mine dear... if u read Ambedkar carefully u 
will understand it better
    thanks


    

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
greenyouth mailinglist is the activist support mailinglist for kerala
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to