"Is it better to be represented/spoken by someone whom you may share a common experience of discrimination or by someone who has never experienced such a discrimination but who shares your political vision and agrees with you to fight out against this discrimination."
Viswanath, Do you think Nalini Jameela's experiences in representing herself in public sphere have its own specificities and perhaps may enrich/ enhance the ongoing theoretical discussions on the problem of identity and representation/ Or do you believe that whatever problems raised by her entry have readymade solutions in the explorations already done? I am asking this just because I fear we [ not excluding me] sometimes evade specific details and fall into beaten tracks. How would you connect the above remark to the discussion in this thread? To repeat, I was one among the interviewers and the transcriber of her autobiography. Is that 'representation'? are you imagining ideal situations? Or are you simply stating that whatever done/ written by ME/ MY FRIENDS are illegitimate? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
