how is it possible to think of an imaginary position for purely transparent communication?
how far individual reflexivity and responsibility in a narration will crumble the prejudices of historical frameworks? is there a scope of individual reflexivity and responsibility if we use some external frameworks as a tool to understand and narrate? On 10/16/07, Dileep Raj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Anil, > > Whether it be I.gopinath or me, the problems in > listening and transcribing are partly structural . So I won't claim > that transparent communication is possible. But we could be > reflexive and responsible in it, which make a difference. > > As memory, the frameworks through which that get narrativised also > have a history which is mediated through gender prejudices...Gopinath > refused to listen and reproduce Nalini's narrations. He filtered it > through > a male framework and thus Nalini can't politically own it.[ that is my > understanding] > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
