Dear friends

whenever i have been reading the reports on night vigil especially by
Kairali Im always reminded of this quote (forgot who wrote it) "the
camera is the penis" in this whole episode of the reporting process.
Ive always felt that Kairali and Cpi(m) assumes this luxury of
watching or taking films of the support groups in the logic of taking
up a pornographic movie where all the actors inside the frames are to
be "sex workers" and I find the crew (irrespective of wo/ men) feels
some sort of a masturbation effect. I very feel strongly that this
"yukthi"/ logic simply comes out that these saamskaarika extras are
supporting a Dalit struggle. This reductionist logic is very much to
be scrutinised in my opinion.

Agree to the positions by ranju, dileep and sanjeev




On Apr 9, 9:07 pm, "ranju radha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> break the hegemony of novels(classic) that looks/portray only the wanted
> 'Heroes/heroines"
> make our own novels by constructing our own "Heroes/heroines" (may be
> unwanted for those classic lovers)
> let "sakshis" clamour "morality" morality"
> let their own "morality" question the call for "morality"
>
> let them talk/live in those "classic" times
> it s de dawn of  new novels (novel experiences)
> let us feel it
> let us be part of it
>
> chodikkanum parayanum alulla veedukalil ninnum purathu varanulla
> samayamanith
> saskhikal adachitta veetukalil ninnum purathu kadakkuka
> aa veedukalil ninnulla adhikarathinte ashanipatamettanu nandigramum
> muthangayum chengarayum nilavilikkunnathu
>
> it s de worst TV progrm i ve ever seen/
> nammal malayalikalude kshama sammathikkanam
> ninakkonnum chodikkanum parayanum arumille ennu sakshiyodaru chodikkum?
>
> On 4/9/08, Dileep Raj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> >                            Art Samaram and Popular Samaram
>
> > As in films, so in activism. " It is the form that is God all else,
> > including even the most arrogant, can only be His instrument.S/he who breaks
> > these laws will end up as an "art" film maker , forever banished from the
> > community of popular films. " (D R Nagaraj, " The Comic Collapse of
> > Authority")
>
> > He says, transgression is an essential component of popular cinema. To
> > quote him again,
> > "Songs and dance are the logical expression of a different notion of
> > morality: They are the ultimate expression of transgression".
>
> > Sanjeev, that's a brilliant coinage.. We are not Samskarika Nayakanmar but
> > Samskarika extras.  We are no more playing second fiddle to 'art" heroes. {
> > Niankkonnum Veettil Chodikkanum Parayanum AArumille? question repeated
> > inSakshi as in that film!!.. Illedo...
> > njangal chorus pani nirthi!! nayakanmarkku vedi ozhiyanum bhavamilla..
> > Swantham script, swantham production...}
>
> > Can we joke at this time?
>
> > To rely one last time on Nagaraj,
>
> > "The comic vision is also employed to laugh at the self righteous belief
> > in the correctness of one's ideas."
>
> > Let us commence a discussion on the emergence of  new genres in Politics?
> > Sunil P Elayidanmar Novelinte aavirbhavatheppatti ippozhum parayunnu!!
> > varoo ee theruvukalile novel forms of life nad novel life styles kanooo...
>
> > On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:04 PM, S sanjeev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >    Some of us have been running to full houses in CPI (M) television
> > > network's
> > >   "saakshi" for the past six weeks.
>
> > >   This, avid media watchers would definitely agree, is a feat not even
> > >    K.karunakaran or M.M Hassan could achieve.
>
> > >   Does this signify the emergence of  "extra" actors ? (If so it might
> > > invert
> > >   the fashionable proposition put forward by - again, some of us - "any
> > >   publicity is good publicity".)
>
> > >   Of course the "extras" are totally disappointed with the roles
> > > assigned to
> > >   them.
>
> > >   I'm sure, had the producers asked, none of us would have accepted
> > > those
> > >   stale and stereotypical roles - anarchist, Maoist, smoking woman, sex
> > >   freedom fighter...
>
> > >   Anyway, it is evident that this film was "made" as part of a grand
> > > project to   topple something that is neither film, nor reality 
> > > television,
> > > but a poignant
> > > subversion called "chengara"- an amazing insurrection of little selves
> > > that
> > > refuses to accept or tolerate hegemonic scripts, producers and
> > > directors.
>
> > >   They don't give a damn about such representations, obviously.
>
> > >   But does that mean the "extra" actors should quit performing?
>
> > >  Does that mean the "extra" actors should stop looking for better
> > > scripts and
> > >  roles?
>
> > > ------------------------------
> > > Yahoo! for Good helps you make a difference
>
> > > <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mailuk/taglines/isp/control/*http://us.rd.yaho...>
>
> > --
> > Dileep R I thuravoor
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to