it is not only the moral positions of how to condcut protest, but the subjective positions of the players that matters and should also be taken into account. as Jenny pointd out. the arguments and enthusiasm shown for hugging protests were not seen when posters pasted against Chitralekha, A dalit woman. Deshabhimani in its news reposrts hadmocked chitralekha also... these were non-issues for feminist groups. it s these very groups now come up with articles/poems/symphatheitc rhetoric etc. nothing wrong. but it d be very kind if dont patronise "all" struggles. thnks
On 4/17/08, appunni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Dear Aravind, > > I had already wrote a reply to Dileep&Reshma. I > think my letter was directed directly to dileep's personal id. So I am > reproducing once again.I forgot to put copy to green youth. Actually > my letter to Dileep raj and Reshma had to be come between > Dileep&Reshma's letter and your letter. Here is my letter. > > Dear Dileep and Reshma, > Thanks for your reply showing correct reference. > In Idukki district where I am staying there was no such report. I > checked in Madhyamam online but again failed. That is why I asked you > to attach a photostat of the same. > After getting your reply, I contacted > Com.M.K.Dasan , State Secretary, Yuvajanavedi for details regarding > this. He said that P.Geetha told in the Meeting that the 'night vigil' > incident has been utilised to divert attention of the people from the > central issue of Chengara Land struggle. He also said that P.Geetha > wanted such actions should assessed. He added that 'assessment' was > intended to be carried out through progressive-democratic forces and > not through an enquiry by some ' crime branch' like government > agencies. > Com.Dasan also told me about the report in > Madhayamam daily Calicut Edition Local page. He told that the news in > Madhyamam was so sensational which can be expected from such media > that can be negelected. > As far as com.Dasan's remarks are concerned, I > feel it is totally correct. Because, such actions will help to expel > diversionary movements and at the same time will help to grow > enforcing movements. > I invite others remarks who were actually present > in the meeting and others for getting viewpoints from different > angles. > Cheers, > appunni (Jayarajan.C.N is my real name. When registered to this forum, > I used my son's pet name as username. So you can call me any). > > sorry for the mistake. > cheers, > appunni > > On 17 Apr, 21:01, Anivar Aravind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > kabeerkatlat wrote: > > > Bharadhwaj Reshma should respond Appunni's question. You have stated a > > > report in Madhyamam (off course your bracketed remarks - anticipatory > > > bail - that you have not read the report! clearly shows the 'reported > > > statement' is fabricated). Atleast the moderator should interfere here > > > against a false (intentional) attempt but in fail. > > > > Geedha Forwarded it in the split-away-list Grey youth movement. > > Since it was a request to moderators i am pointing the link to it > > Thanks geedha for pointing it > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/grey-youth-movement/msg/4f99964b7ed86240 > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
