Dear Aravind,
I had already wrote a reply to Dileep&Reshma. I
think my letter was directed directly to dileep's personal id. So I am
reproducing once again.I forgot to put copy to green youth. Actually
my letter to Dileep raj and Reshma had to be come between
Dileep&Reshma's letter and your letter. Here is my letter.
Dear Dileep and Reshma,
Thanks for your reply showing correct reference.
In Idukki district where I am staying there was no such report. I
checked in Madhyamam online but again failed. That is why I asked you
to attach a photostat of the same.
After getting your reply, I contacted
Com.M.K.Dasan , State Secretary, Yuvajanavedi for details regarding
this. He said that P.Geetha told in the Meeting that the 'night vigil'
incident has been utilised to divert attention of the people from the
central issue of Chengara Land struggle. He also said that P.Geetha
wanted such actions should assessed. He added that 'assessment' was
intended to be carried out through progressive-democratic forces and
not through an enquiry by some ' crime branch' like government
agencies.
Com.Dasan also told me about the report in
Madhayamam daily Calicut Edition Local page. He told that the news in
Madhyamam was so sensational which can be expected from such media
that can be negelected.
As far as com.Dasan's remarks are concerned, I
feel it is totally correct. Because, such actions will help to expel
diversionary movements and at the same time will help to grow
enforcing movements.
I invite others remarks who were actually present
in the meeting and others for getting viewpoints from different
angles.
Cheers,
appunni (Jayarajan.C.N is my real name. When registered to this forum,
I used my son's pet name as username. So you can call me any).
sorry for the mistake.
cheers,
appunni
On 17 Apr, 21:01, Anivar Aravind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> kabeerkatlat wrote:
> > Bharadhwaj Reshma should respond Appunni's question. You have stated a
> > report in Madhyamam (off course your bracketed remarks - anticipatory
> > bail - that you have not read the report! clearly shows the 'reported
> > statement' is fabricated). Atleast the moderator should interfere here
> > against a false (intentional) attempt but in fail.
>
> Geedha Forwarded it in the split-away-list Grey youth movement.
> Since it was a request to moderators i am pointing the link to it
> Thanks geedha for pointing it
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/grey-youth-movement/msg/4f99964b7ed86240
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
