state in many cases acts as terror mechanism. see fake encounter killings, fake arrests, POTA kind of terror laws, etc. even after that we r happily associating with it. aren;t we answerable?
On 5/17/08, Murali K Warier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Terror apology of course comes in different shades. The branding of anybody > who questions the dominant politically correct view on terrorism as Hindu > fanatics has skewed the debate in favor of the real fanatics. After all, who > in his right senses want to be labeled a Hindutvavadi? > > >RSS might have cut and pasted Ambedkar's photo on its booklets and > webstes/ online communitiesdoes it disqualify Ambedkar? NO. > > What is it supposed to imply? That a message in a forum run by Khalistani > sympathizers doesn't 'disqualify' human rights activists? Maybe. But what > was the need, one wonders. > > > talking against humanright activists, these politcal/religious > fanatics want to bring more anti-human terror laws to harass people.. > > The human rights activists who have no qualms in associating with admirers > of Bhindranwale needs to be talked against, IMHO. > > By the way, where in the Acorn's analysis does it implied that more 'anti > human terror-laws' need to be brought in to 'harass people'? > > Best regards, > Murali > > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 6:58 PM, ranju radha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Liberty, if it means anything, is the right to tell people what they don't > want to hear. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
