Hi,

Yesterday we had discussion with Mr. Stanley of CU.
We called him to convince the seriousness of this issue.
[He is not knowing the full details]

He was challenging us what could be done on this.
See, how BIG have people become with a party label.

Regards,
GK V


On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:24 PM, gk31.vinod gk31.vinod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> HINDUISM v/s COMMUNISM
>
> Hinduist feudalists said 'caste' and tried to utilise it.
> Communist leads say forget 'CASTE'  : Because they know it is the best tool
> today. If one forget his caste, he forget reasons of his backwardness. Then
> he could be exploited.
> The study report on engineering college (by IRTC & posted by Mr. Haynes) is
> a communist sponsored program, so need to discuss it further. What I prefer
> to say is have separate technical institutions for S/C-S/T, give intensive
> training there. B'se S/C students are not performing well esp. in Maths,
> b'se that subject requires intensive guidance. How many S/C parents can
> teach their son/daughter on high school maths.
>
> Till today communism has won, with nobody including S/C, has given a look
> in to CU issue....People say they can't believe it. What we ask is THEN WHAT
> YOU BEIEVE IN?
> I donot know how people have become so idiotic in kerala....
>
> Regards,
> GK V
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 4:31 PM, gk31.vinod gk31.vinod <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> See Ranju,
>>
>> The ONE mark failures are again bit tricky. It happens on the border of
>> moderation. It is not the case that people are getting actual marks like
>> that, but they corrupt for that.
>>
>> for e.g. 34  is a failure if moderation is 15 i.e. 34+1+15 = 50 , pass
>> mark.
>>            39 is a failure if moderation is 10  i.e. 39+1+10 = 50, pass
>> mark.
>>
>> They need not to tell moderation of the respective chances since it is
>> again secret by law.
>>
>> Still, RTI for a mass data collection will be useful, since we can scan
>> for figures like 38,39,33,34 etc.
>>
>> You know one more thing. If you write for 10 marks also, we get sometimes
>> this 34 or 39 just to destroy our confidence. Failing for ONE mark is really
>> disturbing. Moreover the university staff also will insult saying that.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sk
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 4:25 PM, ranju radha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>
>>> u can ask them to give info abt how many SC/ST students failed and their
>>> marks etc. Then u will have a data of the number of SC students failed over
>>> a period of time  and their marks. If it is like one mark kind... one can
>>> use this as evidence to challenge it... and even produce it as a proof for
>>> such malprractises. i was just thinkng abt that possibilty, if there exist
>>> such a possibility.
>>> does RTI apply to exams?
>>> people have succefully tried RTI to bring to light the anomalies in
>>> selection process. for eg: in JNU, new delhi
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 4:14 PM, gk31.vinod gk31.vinod <
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Examination procedures are secret by law, hence  RTI is helpless. You
>>>> can't get information on professor who did the valuation etc...
>>>>
>>>> This secrecy is what CPI[M] is exploiting and that is WHY they want to
>>>> rule universities.
>>>> Only solution is to apply POWER and get details....
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>> GKV
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 8:55 AM, ranju radha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  hi vinod,
>>>>>
>>>>> i dont think those SCs in CPI M will be able to do anything.
>>>>> What abt filing an RTI so that we get facts in writtern form from the
>>>>> university itself..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 12:25 AM, gk31.vinod gk31.vinod <
>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I contacted Mr. O.P. Ravindran.
>>>>>> He also suggested to give a formal complaint on this.
>>>>>> But we can't give the identity of students, without any assurance that
>>>>>> an action could be expected. We can't expect an academical inquiry can
>>>>>> easily bring out the truths. Best enquiry is from CPI[M] leads who 
>>>>>> belong to
>>>>>> S/C caste. We contacted many such people, all of which told us to first
>>>>>> prove the reported cases are not 'personal' problems(else they will face
>>>>>> action from party). What is the proof we can give for that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Whatever formal complaint we give, these people including Mr. O.P.
>>>>>> Ravindran or Senate Member, can do a prima facie inquiry and see such 
>>>>>> issues
>>>>>> are happening there or not.  Then to initiate a formal procedure only
>>>>>> complaint is required. Moreover, what ever we say, they are not going to
>>>>>> believe, untill they get solid proofs from inside university. They have
>>>>>> contacts to inquire on this and they can use it, since it is not for a
>>>>>> personal benefit, as it is one of the very serious issue faced by Dalit
>>>>>> students today. I donot why these leads become extraordinary gentle, 
>>>>>> when in
>>>>>> the face of core issues. Finding out proofs is not complicated as this is
>>>>>> not an issue of a single student or this is not known to many people. 
>>>>>> Many
>>>>>> political leads & staff inside university(including our relatives) know
>>>>>> this. Even DYFI leads from S/C category are aware of this. What is 
>>>>>> lacking
>>>>>> is a common interest. Only leads can streamline that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Once somebody other than us do such an inquiry and confirm the issue,
>>>>>> then procedures will become very simple & fast. We can get support from
>>>>>> S/C-S/T organisations and hence more people to guide (& ofcourse protect)
>>>>>> us. Then more students also will come to public and report their 
>>>>>> issues...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> G K Vinod.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 8:05 PM, ranju radha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  and as far as i know there is dalit students assn in CAlicut
>>>>>>> university.. can contact Raveendran (i thinks so)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to