is this katju guy a member of greenyouth? remember, the debate here sometime ago that bearded guys are anti-social elements who live in utopia:-)
--- On Tue, 31/3/09, ranju radha <[email protected]> wrote: From: ranju radha <[email protected]> Subject: [GreenYouth] Re: Fwd: Slums of India.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! To: [email protected] Date: Tuesday, 31 March, 2009, 10:24 AM in fact, even indian judiciary wont let you claim that status. see justice KAtju's brahimnical secular stand that stereotypes 'muslim' pathetic! http://www.hindu.com/2009/03/31/stories/2009033159561000.htm Secularism cannot be overstretched: Justice Katju New Delhi: Rejecting the plea of a Muslim student that he should be permitted to sport beard in his convent school, the Supreme Court on Monday observed that secularism could not be overstretched and “Talibanisation” of the country could not be permitted. “We don’t want to have Talibans in the country. Tomorrow a girl student may come and say that she wants to wear a burqa. Can we allow it,” asked Justice Markandey Katju, speaking for a Bench headed by Justice Raveendran. Asserting that he was a secularist to the core, Justice Katju, however, said religious beliefs could not be overstretched. “I am secularist. We should strike a balance between rights and personal beliefs. We cannot overstretch secularism.”Plea dismissed Justice Katju made these observations while dismissing the petition by Mohammad Salim of the Nirmala Convent Higher Secondary School, a government-recognised minority institution in Madhya Pradesh, for quashing its regulation requiring students to be clean shaven. Challenging a Madhya Pradesh High Court verdict that earlier dismissed his plea, Salim said every citizen was entitled to follow his religious principles and no one should restrain him from doing so in a secular country. Salim’s counsel Justice (retired) B.A. Khan argued that sporting a beard was an indispensable part of Islam. “But you [Justice Khan] don’t sport a beard,” Justice Katju told counsel. The court then said a minority institution had its own set of rules and rights provided by Article 30 of the Constitution and the same could not be breached by any person. “If there are rules you have to obey. You can’t say that I will not wear a uniform I will [wear] only a burqa,” the Bench observed. The court said if the student was not interested in following the rules he would have the option of joining some other institution. “But you can’t ask the school to change the rules for you.” — PTI --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
