On Sunday, 01 January 2017 at 04:08:20 pm -0500, Innocent Smith wrote: > Thanks for your message. I think I've figured out a solution, which is to > use *sur(hj>)ge,(i)*. I'm happy with how that looks. I'm a little less > happy with *ex(ig)cél(hi>)so:(gf), *but I'm not sure how exactly it could > be improved. Here's the manuscript for reference:
Dear Father, I'm glad you were able to find something that worked for the figure over "surge." I will have to defer to you and perhaps others on this list as certainly having more Dominican chant expertise than myself. If you can come up with some suggestions for the figure over "excelso," I can see what can be done about integrating the changes. Henry _______________________________________________ Gregorio-users mailing list Gregorio-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users
