On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:33:04AM +0200, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Susan Hares <[email protected]> wrote:
> > As the IDR co-chairs sat in the grow meeting, we heard of an IDR
> > draft that was so long in becoming an RFC that the Grow authors took
> > another approach (which was less desired).
> 
> I'm unsure what draft this is? this might be the gshut draft?  

GROW's draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut had a dependency on
draft-ietf-idr-reserved-extended-communities which related to
draft-ietf-idr-as4octet-extcomm-generic-subtype - eventually this was
resolved by just working with RFC 1997 well-known communities.

Kind regards,

Job

_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Reply via email to