On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 04:52:58AM -0400, Susan Hares wrote: > If this solution was good was the best solution, there is no further > work.
Correct. Upon further discussion in GROW, consensus seems to be that the transitive nature of the GRACEFUL_SHUTDOWN signal is a feature, not a bug. There is no IDR blocker for draft-ietf-grow-bgp-gshut to proceed. However, somewhere in the future it might be useful to have the ability to assign functions to well-known non-transitive extended community values. So while we may not need draft-ietf-idr-reserved-extended-communities today, it might be useful tomorrow - moving draft-ietf-idr-reserved-extended-communities forward might be a good thing. > If this solution was due to the slow progress of IDR, I'd like to > know. > We've been trying to fast track all operator needs. I appreciate that - and I think the approach is working. Kind regards, Job _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
