Thank you for reference to Ericsson’s implementation. Please send me offline a contact for this implementation.
Sue From: Idr [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Tantsura Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 5:41 AM To: Susan Hares; 'Peter Schoenmaker'; 'Christopher Morrow' Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Idr] Are there IDR drafts the Grow WG needs completed quickly? Sue/ draft-ietf-idr-best-external authors, Don’t recall call for implementations, there’s an implementation in Ericsson’s SEOS/IPOS Cheers, Jeff From: Idr <[email protected]> on behalf of Susan Hares <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, July 20, 2017 at 11:24 To: 'Peter Schoenmaker' <[email protected]>, 'Christopher Morrow' <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Idr] Are there IDR drafts the Grow WG needs completed quickly? Peter: After discussion on the WG list, the draft-ietf-idr-best-external decided to revise their approach. We are awaiting the authors to indicate: a) draft is now ready for WG LC, and b) there are implementations. Perhaps the authors could let you on by responding to this email. Sue From: Idr [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter Schoenmaker Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 5:14 AM To: 'Christopher Morrow'; Susan Hares Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Idr] Are there IDR drafts the Grow WG needs completed quickly? Hi Sue, I don’t believe that there are any more drafts dependant on work progressing through idr. gshut had additional reasons for not progressing, which have been solved and last call will be issued. The gshut draft has an informative reference to draft-ietf-idr-best-external. I see from the mailing list there was a last call, but no conclusion, and the draft subsequently expired. Is there an expectation this draft will continue to progress? thanks peter On 20 July 2017 at 10:41:22, Susan Hares ([email protected]) wrote: Chris: Yes – it is gshust. Please see slide 3 of the gshut presentation. Waiting for the dependency on a draft - Draft-ietf-idr-reserved-extended-communities - Draft-ietf-idr-as4octet-exztcomm-generic-subtype We will do early allocation of code points for any draft adopted by IDR. Either the authors or another WG can asked us to do these early code point allocation. See From: Idr [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 4:33 AM To: Susan Hares Cc: [email protected] List; [email protected] [email protected] Subject: Re: [Idr] Are there IDR drafts the Grow WG needs completed quickly? On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Susan Hares <[email protected]> wrote: Grow and IDR groups: As the IDR co-chairs sat in the grow meeting, we heard of an IDR draft that was so long in becoming an RFC that the Grow authors took another approach (which was less desired). I'm unsure what draft this is? this might be the gshut draft? I don't believe we have other work waiting in a similar state, Peter, do any come to mind for you? We would like to know what IDR drafts need to be moved forward quickly. If you would send the name of these drafts to the chairs, it would help us push forward these critical drafts. You can send these names in response to this email or send a private note to the IDR chairs. Sue Hares _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
