On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 9:55 AM Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 09:38:03AM +0800, Christopher Morrow wrote: > > I'd say: "Sure, make a protobuf definition, provide a common toolset > > to parse to/from this, evangelize that to the networks you care to > > interconnect with" > > seems great to me. > > Protobufs is a weak schema language. Stick to yang. > > Protobufs is a fine transport for yang. :-)
ha! ok, so my format selection is influenced by my job's choice for format selection. Point really being: 'pick some common format, document and tool around it, then evangelize" (I think we agree on this general re-wording / goal) _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
