On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Peter Hosey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Nov 14, 2008, at 15:03:40, Christopher Forsythe wrote: > > That is the standard way. One user may want one thing while another > > user may want another. > > You're talking about *writing* preferences to the system-level > locations. larkost is asking for Growl to *look at* (i.e., read) the > system-level plists. > No, I'm saying that it's the standard way/location, based on what changed in 10.5.3(ish) that you outlined and the fact that pushing preferences like this are kind of blah. If an end user wants to know that there is a newer version of Growl, I don't see how that's a big deal. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
