At the moment, I think we will just break glibmm ABI at a particular glibmm version and not attempt to wrap that version of glib for both glibmm ABIs.
The current glib is 2.24. The next one will be glib 2.26, probably within 6 months. I suggest that glibmm 2.26 will wrap glib 2.6, without breaking ABI. Then glibmm 2.28 would break ABI and wrap glib 2.8. I think it's wroth waiting until glib 2.28 because I don't believe that GTK+ 3.0.0 (or GNOME 3) will be done within six months. But that's not the official GTK+ or GNOME opinion. If I am wrong then we can quickly adapt. In the meantime, so we can start work in a branch, we need some temporary ABI name that is obviously not something to consider stable. I suggest glibmm-2.26maybe . -- [email protected] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
