On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 11:07 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > At the moment, I think we will just break glibmm ABI at a particular > glibmm version and not attempt to wrap that version of glib for both > glibmm ABIs. > > The current glib is 2.24. The next one will be glib 2.26, probably > within 6 months. I suggest that glibmm 2.26 will wrap glib 2.6, without > breaking ABI. > > Then glibmm 2.28 would break ABI and wrap glib 2.8. > > I think it's wroth waiting until glib 2.28 because I don't believe that > GTK+ 3.0.0 (or GNOME 3) will be done within six months. But that's not > the official GTK+ or GNOME opinion. If I am wrong then we can quickly > adapt. > > In the meantime, so we can start work in a branch, we need some > temporary ABI name that is obviously not something to consider stable. I > suggest glibmm-2.26maybe .
I just saw this post. Does that mean that wrapping GSettings should wait until a new branch? Also, I'm willing to take some time and wrap some things that might not be wrapped, but only if no one else is working on that already. -- José _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
