On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 10:37 -0400, José Alburquerque wrote: > On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 11:07 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > > At the moment, I think we will just break glibmm ABI at a particular > > glibmm version and not attempt to wrap that version of glib for both > > glibmm ABIs. > > > > The current glib is 2.24. The next one will be glib 2.26, probably > > within 6 months. I suggest that glibmm 2.26 will wrap glib 2.6, without > > breaking ABI. > > > > Then glibmm 2.28 would break ABI and wrap glib 2.8. > > > > I think it's wroth waiting until glib 2.28 because I don't believe that > > GTK+ 3.0.0 (or GNOME 3) will be done within six months. But that's not > > the official GTK+ or GNOME opinion. If I am wrong then we can quickly > > adapt. > > > > In the meantime, so we can start work in a branch, we need some > > temporary ABI name that is obviously not something to consider stable. I > > suggest glibmm-2.26maybe . > > I just saw this post. Does that mean that wrapping GSettings should > wait until a new branch?
No, there's no reason to wait. > Also, I'm willing to take some time and wrap > some things that might not be wrapped, but only if no one else is > working on that already. > -- [email protected] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
