On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 11:07 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > At the moment, I think we will just break glibmm ABI at a particular > glibmm version and not attempt to wrap that version of glib for both > glibmm ABIs. > > The current glib is 2.24. The next one will be glib 2.26, probably > within 6 months. I suggest that glibmm 2.26 will wrap glib 2.6, without > breaking ABI. > > Then glibmm 2.28 would break ABI and wrap glib 2.8. > > I think it's wroth waiting until glib 2.28 because I don't believe that > GTK+ 3.0.0 (or GNOME 3) will be done within six months. But that's not > the official GTK+ or GNOME opinion. If I am wrong then we can quickly > adapt. > > In the meantime, so we can start work in a branch, we need some > temporary ABI name that is obviously not something to consider stable. I > suggest glibmm-2.26maybe .
I have created the glibmm-3maybe branch, so we can make ABI-breaking changes there. I've made some obvious small changes already. http://git.gnome.org/browse/glibmm/log/?h=glibmm-3maybe But I have not yet changed the ABI name, so don't install it. At some point soon I will change it and move glibmm-3maybe work to master. -- [email protected] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
